Jtelecom
22.05.2008, 19:03 |
Nancy Pelosi (Off Topic) |
Windfall Tax on Retirement Income
Adding a tax to your retirement is simply another way of saying to the American people, you're so darn stupid that we're going to keep doing this until we drain every cent from you. That's what the Speaker of the House is saying. Read below...............
Nancy Pelosi wants a Windfall Tax on Retirement Income.. In other words tax what you have made by investing toward your retirement. This woman is a nut case! You aren't going to believe this.
Madam speaker Nancy Pelosi wants to put a Windfall Tax on all stock market profits (including Retirement fund, 401K and Mutual Funds! Alas, it is true - all to help the 12 Million Illegal Immigrants and other unemployed Minorities!
This woman is frightening.
She quotes...' We need to work toward the goal of equalizing income, (didn't Marx say something like this), in our country and at the same time limiting the amount the rich can invest.' ( I am not rich, are you)
When asked how these new tax dollars would be spent, she replied:
'We need to raise the standard of living of our poor, unemployed and minorities. For example, we have an estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in our country who need our help along with millions of unemployed minorities. Stock market windfall profits taxes could go a long way to guarantee these people the standard of living they would like to have as 'Americans'.' (Read that quote again and again and let it sink in. Lower your retirement, give it to others who have not worked as you have for it.
The Dumbocrats are just way out of control.
Jtelecom is located in [NA] and he is available to meet: NO ---
Jtelecom
5 Strip Surgeries (4 Bosley, 1 AlviArmani)
3 FUE Surgeries (2 Undisclosed, 1 AlviArmani)
(Latest FUE Surgery: June 6, 2008 - AlviArmani Los Angeles) |
brm
his room,
23.05.2008, 19:01
@ Jtelecom
|
Nancy Pelosi |
100% agreed.
I'm not american but I'm afraid the US will dash to falsely alluring arms next fall. Obama, if elected, will undoubtedly heed this post marxist credo which we, europeans have been foolishly embracing for 60 years. remember one point: once a social benefit is granted, it can never be retrieved. It becomes fodder to any left wing stumper who raises the flag of "dangerous impoverishing right wing policies that aim at taking from the poor what they get from... "(end of quote)...tax payers. Yes, spending 10 billion bucks every month on a lost war is foolish but spending that much on idlers is lethal. And this drift is a universal characteristic of democracies, a kind of autoimmune disease.
brm is located in HIS ROOM and he is available to meet: YES
email hairsite@aol.com to arrange a meeting. |
Jtelecom
23.05.2008, 23:54
@ brm
|
Nancy Pelosi |
Wow. Now that is refreshing coming from someone other than an American. I am certainly not for spending money on a war that has no support, but I am damned if my tax dollars are going to go to help the impoverished welfare state buy cell phones. I was in the checkout line at the supermarket the other day. Ahead of me was a black woman with three very young children. She was attempting to use her welfare check on a portion of the groceries (that were permitted to be purchased with the check) and the other portion with a governement issued welfare "credit card". The young guy at the cash register had not a clue how to do the paperwork on the purchase and had to call a manager over - her purchase took over 15 minutes! The whole frickin time, the mother was on her frickin cell phone talking to Shananay (Martin Lawrence reference) and acted put off and angry when they interupted her conversation and asked her for information. How in the world can she afford a cell phone and can't afford groceries to feed her children? I imagine that her monthly "income" from welfare is based on the number of children she has. Heck, she can just have another kid to pay for the cell phone - they are as "throw-away" as the cell phone, aren't they? This is the kind of bullsh*t that gives the Democrats wet dreams. Tax and spend, tax and spend, tax and spend - oh, and hug a tree.
Don't get me wrong here. I am all for helping those who desperately need it. I am NOT for supporting those who could easily get a job and support themselves. If one can't afford children, wear a frickin condom or use birth control.
Jtelecom is located in [NA] and he is available to meet: NO ---
Jtelecom
5 Strip Surgeries (4 Bosley, 1 AlviArmani)
3 FUE Surgeries (2 Undisclosed, 1 AlviArmani)
(Latest FUE Surgery: June 6, 2008 - AlviArmani Los Angeles) |
brm
his room,
24.05.2008, 16:05
@ Jtelecom
|
Nancy Pelosi |
Jtel, in our declining western societies, we have entered an era of growing irresponsibility. Living in a country where welfare benefits are 100 times those available in yours, I can tell you that the tack is now well established: People moan and wail for social benefits that allegedly provide them with the NECESSARY whereas in the same time, those wailers spend away their private income on the SUPERFLUOUS. We are in societies where people can afford the superfluous but not the necessary which they feel entitled to grab from real working classes. The problem is that the political support for this ever growing demographics is no longer fringe. I think this was about it with J. Edwards' constituency. And the guy now endorses Obama... I am no Mc Cain's supporter but this old lion might well be less prone to hurt his own country that the young one, however appealing and prepossessing obama may be.
brm is located in HIS ROOM and he is available to meet: YES
email hairsite@aol.com to arrange a meeting. |
Mr. Frodo
26.05.2008, 22:39
@ Jtelecom
|
Nancy Pelosi |
401k is supposed to grow tax free for our retirment, what s the point in having 401K retirement plans when the democrats are taxing these plans ?
tax hike is not the solution, the democrats will destroy the already pathetic economy
Mr. Frodo is located in [NA] and he is available to meet: NO |
Jtelecom
27.05.2008, 02:07
@ Mr. Frodo
|
Nancy Pelosi |
» 401k is supposed to grow tax free for our retirment, what s the point in
» having 401K retirement plans when the democrats are taxing these plans ?
»
» tax hike is not the solution, the democrats will destroy the already
» pathetic economy
Exactly, Mr. Frodo.
Jtelecom is located in [NA] and he is available to meet: NO ---
Jtelecom
5 Strip Surgeries (4 Bosley, 1 AlviArmani)
3 FUE Surgeries (2 Undisclosed, 1 AlviArmani)
(Latest FUE Surgery: June 6, 2008 - AlviArmani Los Angeles) |
cal
28.05.2008, 23:56
@ Jtelecom
|
Nancy Pelosi |
There is no way in hell that sane, rational people are really gonna purposely have more children just for the welfare money. No matter how poor they might be.
Poor people tend to have kids they can't support. They also tend to take welfare money. But that doesn't mean the one causes the other. Richer people have complained that poor people are giving birth to too many kids for thousands of years.
cal is located in [NA] and he is available to meet: NO |
Jtelecom
29.05.2008, 13:21
@ cal
|
Nancy Pelosi |
My point being that the social welfare system in the US is broken. It has become a beast and a burden. One would have to be insane not to see that there are countless people out there who take advantage of the system. If you were paid not to work, would you? The system was not broken by the Bush Administration, which is, according to CNN, MSNBC and all of the other left-wing news outlets, the source of all the worlds problems. It is comical to watch people like Kieth Oberman (sp?)from MSNBC actively and aggresively campaigning for Obama by trying to belittle the Bush Administration. Kieth and his ilk are shameless. Real candidates don't need some half-wit pundit pandering for them. Obama is running on the "change" mantra, but his change is more of the same - tax and spend liberalism.
Jtelecom is located in [NA] and he is available to meet: NO ---
Jtelecom
5 Strip Surgeries (4 Bosley, 1 AlviArmani)
3 FUE Surgeries (2 Undisclosed, 1 AlviArmani)
(Latest FUE Surgery: June 6, 2008 - AlviArmani Los Angeles) |
rooster
29.05.2008, 22:58
@ Jtelecom
|
Nancy Pelosi |
I hate Democrats with a passion but this thread starter is not true. This email has been circulating for a long time and it appears to be false. snopes.com
Again, I wouldn't be surprised with that bunch of dump loser POS but I think this one is false.
rooster is located in [NA] and he is available to meet: NO |
Jtelecom
30.05.2008, 00:15
@ rooster
|
Nancy Pelosi |
Yeah, you are most likely correct. When I received the email I was so pissed about it that I had to (reluctantly) post it.
Jtelecom is located in [NA] and he is available to meet: NO ---
Jtelecom
5 Strip Surgeries (4 Bosley, 1 AlviArmani)
3 FUE Surgeries (2 Undisclosed, 1 AlviArmani)
(Latest FUE Surgery: June 6, 2008 - AlviArmani Los Angeles) |
maneless
28.07.2008, 09:05
@ Jtelecom
|
Nancy Pelosi |
» Windfall Tax on Retirement Income
»
» Adding a tax to your retirement is simply another way of saying to the
» American people, you're so darn stupid that we're going to keep doing this
» until we drain every cent from you. That's what the Speaker of the House is
» saying. Read below...............
»
» Nancy Pelosi wants a Windfall Tax on Retirement Income.. In other words
» tax what you have made by investing toward your retirement. This woman is a
» nut case! You aren't going to believe this.
»
» Madam speaker Nancy Pelosi wants to put a Windfall Tax on all stock
» market profits (including Retirement fund, 401K and Mutual Funds! Alas, it
» is true - all to help the 12 Million Illegal Immigrants and other
» unemployed Minorities!
»
» This woman is frightening.
» She quotes...' We need to work toward the goal of equalizing income,
» (didn't Marx say something like this), in our country and at the same time
» limiting the amount the rich can invest.' ( I am not rich, are you)
»
» When asked how these new tax dollars would be spent, she replied:
» 'We need to raise the standard of living of our poor, unemployed and
» minorities. For example, we have an estimated 12 million illegal immigrants
» in our country who need our help along with millions of unemployed
» minorities. Stock market windfall profits taxes could go a long way to
» guarantee these people the standard of living they would like to have as
» 'Americans'.' (Read that quote again and again and let it sink in. Lower
» your retirement, give it to others who have not worked as you have for it.
»
»
»
» The Dumbocrats are just way out of control.
Of course the government should be allowed to tax the money we make off our investments. The government already does this. I paid taxes on stock profits that I made last year and if I make a profit on stocks this year then I should pay taxes on those profits. What is your problem with paying taxes on profits? I have no problem with paying taxes of profits. Are you saying that If you put money into a bank account and draw 10s of thousands of dollars in interests per year you should not have to pay taxes on those 10s of thousands of dollars you earn each year in interest? If you are saying that then what you are saying is that you don't want to pay income tax and that's irresponsible and reckless and selfish. If you aren't willing to pay income taxes on your profits then that means that you aren't willing to pay to have a country. You aren't willing to pay to keep America safe and strong. It sounds like you are saying you shouldn't have to pay income taxes and if that is what you are saying then by all means don't pay income taxes and I hope you find yourself sharing a cell with Wesley Snipes.
maneless is located in [NA] and he is available to meet: NO |
maneless
28.07.2008, 09:11
@ Mr. Frodo
|
Nancy Pelosi |
» 401k is supposed to grow tax free for our retirment, what s the point in
» having 401K retirement plans when the democrats are taxing these plans ?
»
» tax hike is not the solution, the democrats will destroy the already
» pathetic economy
It grows tax free but when we take it out later we still have to pay taxes on it. I've known that for years.
maneless is located in [NA] and he is available to meet: NO |
maneless
28.07.2008, 09:12
@ Jtelecom
|
Nancy Pelosi |
» » 401k is supposed to grow tax free for our retirment, what s the point in
» » having 401K retirement plans when the democrats are taxing these plans
» ?
» »
» » tax hike is not the solution, the democrats will destroy the already
» » pathetic economy
»
» Exactly, Mr. Frodo.
It is Bush (republican) who had damaged our economy. Clinton (democrat) had a splendid economy and Bush wrecked it.
maneless is located in [NA] and he is available to meet: NO |
maneless
28.07.2008, 09:18
@ brm
|
Nancy Pelosi |
» 100% agreed.
»
» I'm not american but I'm afraid the US will dash to falsely alluring arms
» next fall. Obama, if elected, will undoubtedly heed this post marxist credo
» which we, europeans have been foolishly embracing for 60 years. remember
» one point: once a social benefit is granted, it can never be retrieved. It
» becomes fodder to any left wing stumper who raises the flag of "dangerous
» impoverishing right wing policies that aim at taking from the poor what
» they get from... "(end of quote)...tax payers. Yes, spending 10 billion
» bucks every month on a lost war is foolish but spending that much on idlers
» is lethal. And this drift is a universal characteristic of democracies, a
» kind of autoimmune disease.
And who is it who will be deciding who is an idler and who legitimately should not be working? You? LOL!!!!!! Are you a doctor so that you have the knowledge, widom, and experience to decide who is and isn't disabled? I think not. Are you a judge so you can have the knowledge, wisdom, and experience to decide who is and is not being discriminated against so much that they can or can not get treated fairly in the workplace? I think not. Are you a doctor who has the knowledge, wisdom, and experience to decide who is to young or too old to fend for themselves? I think not. I think you just don't want your tax dollars helping others and so you will say all disabled persons should work, all young people should pay their own way no matter their circumstances or age, and all elderly should pay their own way no matter their age or health condition. You'll throw away truckloads of money on an Iraq war that never needed to be fought and shouldn't have been fought but you begrudge every tax penny that goes to support an elderly person, a disabled person, a child, or a person facing insurmountable discrimination. You simply do not have a social conscience.
maneless is located in [NA] and he is available to meet: NO |
maneless
28.07.2008, 09:23
@ Jtelecom
|
Nancy Pelosi |
» Wow. Now that is refreshing coming from someone other than an American. I
» am certainly not for spending money on a war that has no support, but I am
» damned if my tax dollars are going to go to help the impoverished welfare
» state buy cell phones. I was in the checkout line at the supermarket the
» other day. Ahead of me was a black woman with three very young children.
» She was attempting to use her welfare check on a portion of the groceries
» (that were permitted to be purchased with the check) and the other portion
» with a governement issued welfare "credit card". The young guy at the cash
» register had not a clue how to do the paperwork on the purchase and had to
» call a manager over - her purchase took over 15 minutes! The whole frickin
» time, the mother was on her frickin cell phone talking to Shananay (Martin
» Lawrence reference) and acted put off and angry when they interupted her
» conversation and asked her for information. How in the world can she afford
» a cell phone and can't afford groceries to feed her children? I imagine
» that her monthly "income" from welfare is based on the number of children
» she has. Heck, she can just have another kid to pay for the cell phone -
» they are as "throw-away" as the cell phone, aren't they? This is the kind
» of bullsh*t that gives the Democrats wet dreams. Tax and spend, tax and
» spend, tax and spend - oh, and hug a tree.
»
» Don't get me wrong here. I am all for helping those who desperately need
» it. I am NOT for supporting those who could easily get a job and support
» themselves. If one can't afford children, wear a frickin condom or use
» birth control.
You know some welfare recipients (possibly the lady you talk about in your post) have cell phones so they can look for work. They need to be able to receive calls and stuff like that. Also, they need phones for health reasons and stuff like that. Since most of these cellphones have unlimited talk anyway what difference does it make if she has a cellphone primarily for job search but also uses it for personal calls? There's also the working poor who need cellphones because their employer demands they have phones. Again, as long as they have to have a phone for employment reasons and health issues what's wrong with them also using those phones for personal calls? Nothing. You're just mean.
maneless is located in [NA] and he is available to meet: NO |
maneless
28.07.2008, 09:28
@ cal
|
Nancy Pelosi |
» There is no way in hell that sane, rational people are really gonna
» purposely have more children just for the welfare money. No matter how
» poor they might be.
»
» Poor people tend to have kids they can't support. They also tend to take
» welfare money. But that doesn't mean the one causes the other. Richer
» people have complained that poor people are giving birth to too many kids
» for thousands of years.
Ridiculous isn't it? It's mean-spirited poop is all it is. These same people who begrudge a sick person, elderly person, child, or a person struggling against insurmountable discrimination getting a dime of help from the government go to church every sunday. Of course, Jesus wants the poor, disabled, elderly, children, and persecuted (those struggling against discrimination) financially protected but these religious right-wingers ignore that fact. Jesus fed a lot of people and protected a lot of people and took care of a lot of people.
maneless is located in [NA] and he is available to meet: NO |
maneless
28.07.2008, 09:35
@ Jtelecom
|
Nancy Pelosi |
» My point being that the social welfare system in the US is broken. It has
» become a beast and a burden. One would have to be insane not to see that
» there are countless people out there who take advantage of the system. If
» you were paid not to work, would you? The system was not broken by the Bush
» Administration, which is, according to CNN, MSNBC and all of the other
» left-wing news outlets, the source of all the worlds problems. It is
» comical to watch people like Kieth Oberman (sp?)from MSNBC actively and
» aggresively campaigning for Obama by trying to belittle the Bush
» Administration. Kieth and his ilk are shameless. Real candidates don't need
» some half-wit pundit pandering for them. Obama is running on the "change"
» mantra, but his change is more of the same - tax and spend liberalism.
Bush has spent us to the brink of bankruptcy and he squandered the money on an Iraq war that never needed to be fought. Studies have already been done on the issue of the frequency of welfare fraud and the 5 of people getting welfare who shouldn't get it is very very small. Anytime you have a system where people get money there are going to be some cases of fraud. Again, the percentage of fraud in the welfare system is very small. That aside, you really don't want your tax dollars helping anyone is the real issue and so you see fraud everywhere in the welfare system. You want the system shut down. You don't want to help the poor, the disabled, the children, the elderly, and the people struggling with insurmountable discrimination. You're stingy. You're probably a creationist who absolutely accepts the existance of God and that Jesus was the son of God, but you ignore Jesus's challenge to mankind because Jesus wants us to protect the people I listed - the poor, the disabled, the elderly, the children, and the people struggling against discrimination.
maneless is located in [NA] and he is available to meet: NO |
Wylie
31.07.2008, 21:30
@ maneless
|
Nancy Pelosi |
» » My point being that the social welfare system in the US is broken. It
» has
» » become a beast and a burden. One would have to be insane not to see
» that
» » there are countless people out there who take advantage of the system.
» If
» » you were paid not to work, would you? The system was not broken by the
» Bush
» » Administration, which is, according to CNN, MSNBC and all of the other
» » left-wing news outlets, the source of all the worlds problems. It is
» » comical to watch people like Kieth Oberman (sp?)from MSNBC actively and
» » aggresively campaigning for Obama by trying to belittle the Bush
» » Administration. Kieth and his ilk are shameless. Real candidates don't
» need
» » some half-wit pundit pandering for them. Obama is running on the
» "change"
» » mantra, but his change is more of the same - tax and spend liberalism.
»
» Bush has spent us to the brink of bankruptcy and he squandered the money
» on an Iraq war that never needed to be fought. Studies have already been
» done on the issue of the frequency of welfare fraud and the 5 of people
» getting welfare who shouldn't get it is very very small. Anytime you have
» a system where people get money there are going to be some cases of fraud.
» Again, the percentage of fraud in the welfare system is very small. That
» aside, you really don't want your tax dollars helping anyone is the real
» issue and so you see fraud everywhere in the welfare system. You want the
» system shut down. You don't want to help the poor, the disabled, the
» children, the elderly, and the people struggling with insurmountable
» discrimination. You're stingy. You're probably a creationist who
» absolutely accepts the existance of God and that Jesus was the son of God,
» but you ignore Jesus's challenge to mankind because Jesus wants us to
» protect the people I listed - the poor, the disabled, the elderly, the
» children, and the people struggling against discrimination.
You nailed it. Thinking people like myself understand exactly what you are saying. I doubt the recipient of your message will understand a word of it.
Wylie is located in [NA] and he is available to meet: NO |
MPB
31.07.2008, 21:59
@ maneless
|
Nancy Pelosi |
» Of course the government should be allowed to tax the money we make off
» our investments. The government already does this. I paid taxes on stock
» profits that I made last year and if I make a profit on stocks this year
» then I should pay taxes on those profits. What is your problem with paying
» taxes on profits? I have no problem with paying taxes of profits. Are you
» saying that If you put money into a bank account and draw 10s of thousands
» of dollars in interests per year you should not have to pay taxes on those
» 10s of thousands of dollars you earn each year in interest? If you are
» saying that then what you are saying is that you don't want to pay income
» tax and that's irresponsible and reckless and selfish. If you aren't
» willing to pay income taxes on your profits then that means that you aren't
» willing to pay to have a country. You aren't willing to pay to keep
» America safe and strong. It sounds like you are saying you shouldn't have
» to pay income taxes and if that is what you are saying then by all means
» don't pay income taxes and I hope you find yourself sharing a cell with
» Wesley Snipes.
Hey Maneless- Go <> yourself. Listening to your countless stupid rants just made me want to post this. Cheers.
MPB has 1 Personal Journal(s). Click here to view
MPB is located in [NA] and he is available to meet: NO |
Jtelecom
07.08.2008, 00:43
@ MPB
|
Nancy Pelosi |
Amen to that, MPB!
Jtelecom is located in [NA] and he is available to meet: NO ---
Jtelecom
5 Strip Surgeries (4 Bosley, 1 AlviArmani)
3 FUE Surgeries (2 Undisclosed, 1 AlviArmani)
(Latest FUE Surgery: June 6, 2008 - AlviArmani Los Angeles) |
therapy
09.08.2008, 15:22
@ maneless
|
Nancy Pelosi |
» Of course the government should be allowed to tax the money we make off
» our investments. The government already does this. I paid taxes on stock
» profits that I made last year and if I make a profit on stocks this year
» then I should pay taxes on those profits. What is your problem with paying
» taxes on profits? I have no problem with paying taxes of profits. Are you
» saying that If you put money into a bank account and draw 10s of thousands
» of dollars in interests per year you should not have to pay taxes on those
» 10s of thousands of dollars you earn each year in interest? If you are
» saying that then what you are saying is that you don't want to pay income
» tax and that's irresponsible and reckless and selfish. If you aren't
» willing to pay income taxes on your profits then that means that you aren't
» willing to pay to have a country. You aren't willing to pay to keep
» America safe and strong. It sounds like you are saying you shouldn't have
» to pay income taxes and if that is what you are saying then by all means
» don't pay income taxes and I hope you find yourself sharing a cell with
» Wesley Snipes.
I don't mind paying income taxes but I am not in favor of the democrats tax rate hikes, the economy is in a bad shape already, raising taxes is not the solution.
therapy is located in [NA] and he is available to meet: NO |
fckhrls
17.08.2008, 02:44
@ maneless
|
Nancy Pelosi |
» » Windfall Tax on Retirement Income
» »
» » Adding a tax to your retirement is simply another way of saying to
» the
» » American people, you're so darn stupid that we're going to keep doing
» this
» » until we drain every cent from you. That's what the Speaker of the House
» is
» » saying. Read below...............
» »
» » Nancy Pelosi wants a Windfall Tax on Retirement Income.. In other
» words
» » tax what you have made by investing toward your retirement. This woman
» is a
» » nut case! You aren't going to believe this.
» »
» » Madam speaker Nancy Pelosi wants to put a Windfall Tax on all stock
» » market profits (including Retirement fund, 401K and Mutual Funds! Alas,
» it
» » is true - all to help the 12 Million Illegal Immigrants and other
» » unemployed Minorities!
» »
» » This woman is frightening.
» » She quotes...' We need to work toward the goal of equalizing income,
» » (didn't Marx say something like this), in our country and at the same
» time
» » limiting the amount the rich can invest.' ( I am not rich, are you)
» »
» » When asked how these new tax dollars would be spent, she replied:
» » 'We need to raise the standard of living of our poor, unemployed and
» » minorities. For example, we have an estimated 12 million illegal
» immigrants
» » in our country who need our help along with millions of unemployed
» » minorities. Stock market windfall profits taxes could go a long way to
» » guarantee these people the standard of living they would like to have
» as
» » 'Americans'.' (Read that quote again and again and let it sink in.
» Lower
» » your retirement, give it to others who have not worked as you have for
» it.
» »
» »
» »
» » The Dumbocrats are just way out of control.
»
» Of course the government should be allowed to tax the money we make off
» our investments. The government already does this. I paid taxes on stock
» profits that I made last year and if I make a profit on stocks this year
» then I should pay taxes on those profits. What is your problem with paying
» taxes on profits? I have no problem with paying taxes of profits. Are you
» saying that If you put money into a bank account and draw 10s of thousands
» of dollars in interests per year you should not have to pay taxes on those
» 10s of thousands of dollars you earn each year in interest? If you are
» saying that then what you are saying is that you don't want to pay income
» tax and that's irresponsible and reckless and selfish. If you aren't
» willing to pay income taxes on your profits then that means that you aren't
» willing to pay to have a country. You aren't willing to pay to keep
» America safe and strong. It sounds like you are saying you shouldn't have
» to pay income taxes and if that is what you are saying then by all means
» don't pay income taxes and I hope you find yourself sharing a cell with
» Wesley Snipes.
Why do you constantly repeat yourself? Of that 16 line paragraph, you had two points, which could have been made in once sentence. Learn to write succinctly you moron.
fckhrls is located in [NA] and he is available to meet: NO |
cal
19.08.2008, 03:38
@ fckhrls
|
Nancy Pelosi |
You can always tell who gets their news from conservative talk radio just by who or what they're bashing at a certain time.
They all started bashing Nancy Pelosi in particular lately.
cal is located in [NA] and he is available to meet: NO |
MPB
19.08.2008, 22:01
@ cal
|
Nancy Pelosi |
» You can always tell who gets their news from conservative talk radio just
» by who or what they're bashing at a certain time.
»
» They all started bashing Nancy Pelosi in particular lately.
And vice versa!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
MPB has 1 Personal Journal(s). Click here to view
MPB is located in [NA] and he is available to meet: NO |
Thread view
Order