Another thing to consider regarding REPCL's retraction... (Hair Loss Research & Clinical Trials)
ccmethinning wrote:
http://www.hairsite.com/hair-loss/forum_entry-id-102235-page-0-category-1-order-last_answer.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yup, no doubt. If they would have released that press release on Monday the 23rd, after the pump pieces had only been running for a few days, the price hadn't run up that much, and they got cold feet about the content of those pieces I could believe that. But releasing after hours Friday when everybody is stuck and the price sufficiently pumped and hundreds of thousands of shares traded, that is planned and that is malicious.
If Monday turns out to be what we all expect, or even worse, I really think we should contact lawyers.
http://hb-securities.com/
Hagens Berman, I've "worked with them" (was part of a class) before in a class action against another sc*m company. Probably would get next to nothing from Replicel, but at least we would bring David Hall, Tobin Smith, and whoever their marketing person is, down into the mud with us. I want reputations ruined over this.
The plan all makes sense now, these companies NEVER care about retail shareholders. What this allowed them to do is pump up the price and create a cushion for them. The technology is likely to fail or provide underwhelming results. But the patent might still be worth something. So assign the patent to the company, take the company public, do a ruse of a trial with a nice front man to attract retail money to pump up the price, and then sell the company (patent) to big pharma or ARI/Follica/Histogen/whoever. This way, the founders (the only people the company cares about, not us retail shareholder schlubs), who got their shares for nothing, interests are maximized. Lets say the share price was still at $1.70, like it was before the pumping started. When the trial fails, the share price might drop to $0.30. But if they pump the stock price up to $2.70, maybe the share price only drops to $0.70 or something when the trial fails. The retail shlubs who bought in at $2.00/share are screwed, but who cares about them? The founders (Hoffmann, McElwee, Shapiro, Lui, Hall) get to cash out at a much higher price (maybe $.70 instead of $.30).
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Iron_Man is located in [NA] and he is available to meet: NO
---
I documented the world’s 1st day-by-day (HST) donor hair regeneration process …
Complete thread:
- Another thing to consider regarding REPCL's retraction...
- ESP2, 28.04.2012, 10:51
![Open in board view [Board]](img/board_d.gif)
- Another thing to consider regarding REPCL's retraction...
- Iron_Man, 28.04.2012, 13:29
- Another thing to consider regarding REPCL's retraction... - Iron_Man, 28.04.2012, 14:20
- Another thing to consider regarding REPCL's retraction...
- KO, 28.04.2012, 15:09
- Another thing to consider regarding REPCL's retraction... - Iron_Man, 28.04.2012, 15:29
- Another thing to consider regarding REPCL's retraction...
- KO, 28.04.2012, 15:09
- Another thing to consider regarding REPCL's retraction...
- MikadoMan, 28.04.2012, 15:34
- Another thing to consider regarding REPCL's retraction... - Iron_Man, 28.04.2012, 15:42
- Another thing to consider regarding REPCL's retraction... - Iron_Man, 28.04.2012, 14:20
- Another thing to consider regarding REPCL's retraction...
- ESP2, 28.04.2012, 16:27
- Another thing to consider regarding REPCL's retraction...
- Iron_Man, 28.04.2012, 16:38
- Another thing to consider regarding REPCL's retraction...
- georgex6, 28.04.2012, 18:34
- Another thing to consider regarding REPCL's retraction...
- MikadoMan, 28.04.2012, 19:21
- Another thing to consider regarding REPCL's retraction... - Freddie555, 29.04.2012, 22:39
- Another thing to consider regarding REPCL's retraction...
- MikadoMan, 28.04.2012, 19:21
- Another thing to consider regarding REPCL's retraction...
- georgex6, 28.04.2012, 18:34
- Another thing to consider regarding REPCL's retraction...
- Iron_Man, 28.04.2012, 16:38
- Another thing to consider regarding REPCL's retraction...
- Iron_Man, 28.04.2012, 13:29



