Hair Loss - Now I am confused....

classified ads


shop
Forum News Hair Transplant Hair Replacement Topical All Natural Drugs Hair Multiplication Gallery Female Hair Loss

Hair Loss

Forum Index   Personal Journal   Poll

Log in | User | Register

Search:  
Back to forum
Board view

Propecia Comprehensive Survey Results
click here
 

Now I am confused.... (Propecia, Avodart, Spiro, DHT & hormones ...)

posted by Bryan, 06.09.2007, 12:29

» Bryan,
»
» So now the reason the researchers are careful is because the weight of
» scientific literature has been stating Estrogen is bad; but I thought your
» position was that it overwhelmingly supported that estrogen was good?
I've already explained that to you: it 100% supports the new paradigm that estrogen is GOOD for scalp hair, BAD for body hair. But those researchers simply didn't understand (until now) that estrogen's effect on hair is SITE SPECIFIC. That's why they were surprised by their results, and caught unawares.

» Which is your position on the balance of scientific literature, I am
» confused?
As above.

» You do seem to ignore the 2 research papers that report that Estrogen
» clearly inhibit telogen to anagen transition, and the groing evidence of
» the different roles of ER-alpha, ER-beta and ER-INS.
What 2 research papers are you referring to?

» Instead you come out firing with a paper based on a statistically
» irrelevant test; sample size = 1 (or 2) and where the sample is
» questionable in terms of MPB history.
»
» Hardly a convincing case!
2 cases? Huh?? Altogether, there must be hundreds (if not thousands) of test-subjects in the full body of work supporting estrogen as a treatment for MPB. I've already explained the numbers to you.


Bryan is located in [NA] and he is available to meet: NO

Post reply
 

Complete thread:

Back to forum
Board view
38206 Postings in 3525 Threads, 1604 registered users
Hair Loss | Admin contact
powered by MLF | FORUM POLICY

Dr. Klein's REMOX: most comprehensive topical hair loss therapy
click here