Hair Loss - What other way is there to "interpret" the research?

classified ads


shop
Forum News Hair Transplant Hair Replacement Topical All Natural Drugs Hair Multiplication Gallery Female Hair Loss

Hair Loss

Forum Index   Personal Journal   Poll

Log in | User | Register

Search:  
Back to forum
Board view

FREE Hair Transplant Consultations with HDC: London - Sep 1-5
 click here
 

What other way is there to "interpret" the research? (Propecia, Spiro, DHT & hormones ...)

posted by Bryan, 06.09.2007, 18:01
(edited by Bryan on 06.09.2007, 18:15)

» Then we interpret the research in different ways and I look forward
» to reviewing again in 2 years:D
As I've pointed out several times over the past several days, all the available research and evidence supports the new paradigm 100%. Not just some of it or even most of it, but all of it. I'm not aware of any conflicting evidence at all in the published medical literature. So what other way IS there to "interpret" the fact that estrogen has been shown to stimulate the growth of human scalp hair follicles? ;-)

More generally, I'm puzzled about why it is you are so stubborn about accepting scientific research. You told me earlier that you would look at the evidence "with an open mind", but not by any stretch of the imagination have you done that. Why not? Are you so stuck in your anti-estrogen mode that you will simply NEVER be able to accept the scientific evidence, no matter how much of it ever comes out?

Post reply
 

Complete thread:

Back to forum
Board view
35238 Postings in 3263 Threads, 1534 registered users
Hair Loss | Admin contact
powered by MLF | FORUM POLICY

Dr. Klein's REMOX Topical Hair Loss Therapy
 click here