Hair Loss - Why should science focus on hairloss instead of cancer

classified ads


shop

Forum News Hair Transplant Hair Replacement Topical All Natural Drugs Hair Multiplication Gallery Female Hair Loss

Hair Loss

Forum Index   Personal Journal   Poll

Log in | User | Register

Back to forum
Board view

FREE Hair Transplant Consultations with HDC: London - Sep 22-25
click here
 

Why should science focus on hairloss instead of cancer (Hair Multiplication & Research)

posted by MPB, 05.05.2008, 07:41

» » I hope this interviewer loses all his frickin hair!
» »
» » http://www.brightcove.tv/title.jsp?title=1127701415&channel=245991542
»
» How do you prioritize research? Personally, I don't think $1 should be
» spent on AIDS until heart disease and cancer are cured (AIDS being a
» largely behavior-based disease where as cancer and heart disease generally
» being genetic). But that's my opinion. In a free market, research will
» generally be motivated by profitability.


Obviously I am not making light of the need to spend money on cancer research... more this guys glib attitude when making reference to even consider treating hairloss as if it is no big deal. Well to a lot of us hair-loss is a slow psychological death and IMO it should not be taken lightly. This may be a bad analogy but what about burn victims? Once they recover and all their vital signs are back to normal, isn't their only issue now of cosmetic concern? Should we then also make light of skin replacement technologies?

MPB has 1 Personal Journal(s). Click here to view
MPB is located in [NA] and he is available to meet: NO

 

Complete thread:

Back to forum
Board view
36384 Postings in 3363 Threads, 1560 registered users
Hair Loss | Admin contact
powered by MLF | FORUM POLICY

Dr. Klein's REMOX: most comprehensive topical hair loss therapy
click here