Hair Loss - Why should science focus on hairloss instead of cancer

classified ads


shop

Forum News Hair Transplant Hair Replacement Topical All Natural Drugs Hair Multiplication Gallery Female Hair Loss

Hair Loss

Forum Index   Personal Journal   Poll

Log in | User | Register

Back to forum
Board view

FREE Hair Transplant Consultations with HDC: London - Sep 1-5
click here
 

Why should science focus on hairloss instead of cancer (Hair Multiplication & Research)

posted by fckhrls, 05.05.2008, 08:03

» » » I hope this interviewer loses all his frickin hair!
» » »
» » » http://www.brightcove.tv/title.jsp?title=1127701415&channel=245991542
» »
» » How do you prioritize research? Personally, I don't think $1 should be
» » spent on AIDS until heart disease and cancer are cured (AIDS being a
» » largely behavior-based disease where as cancer and heart disease
» generally
» » being genetic). But that's my opinion. In a free market, research
» will
» » generally be motivated by profitability.
»
»
» Obviously I am not making light of the need to spend money on cancer
» research... more this guys glib attitude when making reference to even
» consider treating hairloss as if it is no big deal. Well to a lot of us
» hair-loss is a slow psychological death and IMO it should not be taken
» lightly. This may be a bad analogy but what about burn victims? Once they
» recover and all their vital signs are back to normal, isn't their only
» issue now of cosmetic concern? Should we then also make light of skin
» replacement technologies?

I totally agree - hairloss is treated as a imasculating joke by society. But for those that suffer from it, it is disfiguring.


fckhrls is located in [NA] and he is available to meet: NO

 

Complete thread:

Back to forum
Board view
36217 Postings in 3345 Threads, 1558 registered users
Hair Loss | Admin contact
powered by MLF | FORUM POLICY

Dr. Klein's REMOX Topical Hair Loss Therapy
click here