Hair Loss

Hair Transplant Reviews & Patient Records
 

Why should science focus on hairloss instead of cancer (Hair Multiplication & Research)

posted by goata007, 06.05.2008, 13:26

» Think what I might have achieved had I had been free to chose a lesser
» priorty vow, like curing cancer, instead!

I feel you man...btw, what do you do?


goata007 is located in [NA] and he is available to meet: NO

---
"If we knew what it was that we were doing, it wouldn't be called research, would it?" - Albert Einstein

Complete thread:

• Why should science focus on hairloss instead of cancer - MPB, 04.05.2008, 21:03
  • Why should science focus on hairloss instead of cancer - baldlatino34, 04.05.2008, 21:32
  • Why should science focus on hairloss instead of cancer - rev, 04.05.2008, 23:25
    • Why should science focus on hairloss instead of cancer - HanginInThere, 05.05.2008, 01:22
  • Why should science focus on hairloss instead of cancer - fckhrls, 05.05.2008, 02:27
    • Why should science focus on hairloss instead of cancer - MPB, 05.05.2008, 07:41
      • Why should science focus on hairloss instead of cancer - fckhrls, 05.05.2008, 08:03
  • Why should science focus on hairloss instead of cancer - Ahab, 05.05.2008, 15:08
    • Why should science focus on hairloss instead of cancer - fckhrls, 05.05.2008, 15:50
      • Why should science focus on hairloss instead of cancer - bugler, 05.05.2008, 16:27
        • Why should science focus on hairloss instead of cancer - baldlatino34, 05.05.2008, 16:43
    • Why should science focus on hairloss instead of cancer - baldIsMe, 05.05.2008, 18:54
      • Why should science focus on hairloss instead of cancer - cal, 05.05.2008, 19:11
      • Why should science focus on hairloss instead of cancer - Ahab, 05.05.2008, 19:22
        • Why should science focus on hairloss instead of cancer - goata007, 06.05.2008, 13:26
        • Why should science focus on hairloss instead of cancer - HanginInThere, 06.05.2008, 15:25