Hair Loss - secrecy , hypocricy , and videotape

classified ads


shop
Forum News Hair Transplant Hair Replacement Topical All Natural Drugs Hair Multiplication Gallery Female Hair Loss

Hair Loss

Forum Index   Personal Journal   Poll

Log in | User | Register

Search:  
Back to forum
Board view

FREE Hair Transplant Consultations with HDC: London - Sep 1-5
 click here
 

secrecy , hypocricy , and videotape (Hair Transplant)

posted by dave21, 20.05.2008, 16:00

» aFranklin- It was premature on the part of any doc to offer clinical FUE
» back in 2000. It’s premature now for any clinic to offer FUE megasessions
» in 2008.
»
» Sux- Are making up statistics and attacking me personally really going to
» help anyone reading this post? Come on, you’re better than that. Besides, I
» never liked ice cream. Let’s get back on track:
»
» Your wrote with respect to Dr. Woods:
» “ When you're getting the same or better yield as the top strip docs of
» the world (over 90%), which they do…”
» Where did you get this incredible statistic? I’ve not seen any evidence to
» support this. In fact, I’ve not even seen Dr. Woods himself make such a
» grand statement.
»
» Dr. Woods-
» I only get interested in particular competitors when they make
» questionable claims or intimations. You claim loudly that your technique is
» better than the FUE technique of any competitor. That may or may not be
» true. I simply challenge your claim. If you are going to go public with
» such a pronouncement, then I can certainly challenge it on a public forum.
» Which I have done, and continue to do. To date you have only attacked me
» instead of supporting your claim.
»
» I wonder, for all your “patient’s rights” rhetoric, do you provide
» complete “Informed Consent”? Specifically, the fact that FUE grafts must
» undergo 3 traumatic forces that strip grafts never endure:
» 1. Torsion
» 2. Traction
» 3. Compression
» (and a few other minor ones).
»
» For those of you out there who have wondered why FUE has not yet put an
» end to STRIP, it is because of these 3 detrimental forces. In the best of
» hands these forces are minimized, that’s what my patents are all about, but
» even so, yields are STILL lower than with strip surgery and is why I
» believe that if large procedures are needed, they should be done with
» strip, not FUE. ( The exception, of course, being patients like Franklin
» who would rather never have a strip surgery again. That’s a different
» matter).
»
» Personally, I couldn’t care less what techniques Dr. Woods uses. I doubt
» they are revolutionary or even interesting. But if he is going to claim
» superiority in this field, he is going to have start by at least telling
» his patients before surgery the true differences between strip surgery and
» FUE surgery. Specifically, the limitations of FUE surgery.
»
» Well, Dr. Woods. How about it? Do you inform your patients of these three
» destructive FUE forces prior to surgery? 1. Torsion 2. Traction 3.
» Compression ?
»
» You see, HT doctors do not make patients sign “waivers” as Dr. Woods loves
» to claim in his never ending effort to vilify other HT doctors. What he
» clearly doesn’t understand is that patients CAN’T “waive” their rights.
» That’s what makes them “rights”. And what he calls “rights” aren’t actually
» “rights”.
»
» What HT doctors actually give patients is an INFORMED CONSENT document
» that TELL them what possible problems they might face should they decide to
» go ahead with a procedure. It also INFORMS them, specifically, of the
» downside of any procedure and that ALTERNATIVE treatments were discussed
» (in some states). The three detrimental forces of FUE and their resulting
» lower yields for FUE procedures must be included to have offered full
» informed consent.
»
» Bverotti,
» Does your doctor give informed consent that makes it clear that FUE yields
» are consistently lower than strip yields because of 1. Torsion 2.
» Traction 3. Compression ?
» Does your doctor inform patients of this during consultation?
»
» Dr. Woods,
» Do you inform your patients of the detrimental forces FUE grafts must
» endure when compared to strip dissection? Or do you claim that your
» particular FUE technique does not inflict the three detrimental forces of
» 1. Torsion 2. Traction 3. Compression ?
»
» Even your most dedicated supporter will be waiting for your answer.

With these forces playing a major role, 1. Torsion
2. Traction
3. Compression
(and a few other minor ones). Is this part of the reason why BHT makes it hard to bring about regrowth?

Post reply
 

Complete thread:

Back to forum
Board view
35825 Postings in 3312 Threads, 1545 registered users
Hair Loss | Admin contact
powered by MLF | FORUM POLICY

Dr. Klein's REMOX Topical Hair Loss Therapy
 click here