Hair Loss - tel baker

hair loss products

Free Ads


shop
Forum News Hair Transplant Hair Replacement Topical All Natural Drugs Hair Multiplication Gallery Female Hair Loss

Hair Loss

Forum Index   Personal Journal   Poll

Log in | User | Register

Search:  
Back to forum
Board view

Hair Transplant Reviews & Patient Records
 

tel baker (Hair Transplant)

posted by Dr. Arvind Homepage E-mail, New Delhi, India, 20.05.2008, 16:31

» This is all very well but here are some contradictions that are common to
» all FUE practitioners.
»
» 1: We are told that density change is unnoticeable until 50% density is
» lost. How can this stack with the philosophy by all FUE docs that only
» 28%-30% of the donor can be removed.
»
» 2: We are told that in the best hands the donor angulation surrounding FUE
» is not changed but all docs admit that scar retraction can change
» angulation.
»
» 3: The residual donor follicles proximal to the extracted FUs are maybe
» 100 times as many compared with strip since every removed FU in FUE leaves
» local donor follicles. The risk to these even in the best hands must be
» pertinent devils halo or not and also regardless of direct transection.
»
» These questions have never been adequately answered and the the idea that
» there are few 5000+ FUE results simple because the procedure is new is no
» longer a viable excuse.
»
» I think we deserve some believable answers at this juncture from those who
» still maintain that FUE can fully replace strip. If it cannot then the
» correct context for FUE needs to be explained but the FUE only or proponent
» clinics.
Dear Marco,
1. FU density and hair calibre is not uniform over the entire safe donor area, in most people. Strip is excised from the donor scalp area that has the maximun FU density and the thickest calibre hair. FUE,on the other hand is extracted from the "lushest" as well as not so lush donor areas.

2. The 50% rule needs to be read in correct perspective. 50% hair, in most people, when grown long, will give adequate coverage. The improtant question is, whether the same will be true if the person shaves/buzz cuts the hair.

Even otherwise, there are certain races (negroid, orientals etc.), where the FU density is naturally low and the 50% thumbrule may not apply.

3. If smaller size instruments are used, and the correct technique employed, damage to surrounding hair is minimal.

4. Scar retraction is not an issue with fue because it is balanced on all sides (unlike the strip, where the retraction forces act in 2 planes).

In the end, its not a question of which technique should replace which.
Each patient should research the options and decide which method suits his aspirations and lifestyle.

Regards,
Dr. A


Dr. Arvind is located in NEW DELHI, INDIA and he is available to meet: YES
email hairsite@aol.com to arrange a meeting.

---
Dr.(Capt) Arvind Poswal
A-9,First Floor,
C.R. Park, (Near Nehru Place),
New Delhi-110019, India. www.fusehair.com
e-mail: poswalarvind@yahoo.co.in
Ph- 91-011-26274368,91-098-101-78062
Hours-10a.m.to 5p.m
Scalp & Body hair transplants

Post reply
 

Complete thread:

Back to forum
Board view
41528 Postings in 3827 Threads, 1679 registered users
Hair Loss | Admin contact
powered by MLF | FORUM POLICY

Dr. Klein: most comprehensive topical hair loss therapy
click here