Hair Loss

London Free Consultations Dec 15-19  |  Hair Transplant Patient Reviews
 

Another example - Follica may actually work! (Hair Multiplication & Research)

posted by biston, 17.06.2008, 05:41

someone can explains to me why this news argues in favour of follica?


biston is located in [NA] and he is available to meet: NO

Complete thread:

• Another example - Follica may actually work! - goata007, 16.06.2008, 00:40 (Hair Multiplication & Research)
  • Another example - Follica may actually work! - rev, 16.06.2008, 02:13
    • Another example - Follica may actually work! - debris, 16.06.2008, 08:45
  • Another example - Follica may actually work! - goata007, 16.06.2008, 20:06
    • Another example - Follica may actually work! - goata007, 17.06.2008, 01:29
      • Another example - Follica may actually work! - risc, 17.06.2008, 05:49
        • Another example - Follica may actually work! - goata007, 17.06.2008, 09:48
          • Another example - Follica may actually work! - biston, 17.06.2008, 10:27
          • Another example - Follica may actually work! - TAGOHL, 17.06.2008, 11:29
        • Thanks, risc - TAGOHL, 17.06.2008, 20:24
          • Thanks, risc - cal, 17.06.2008, 21:10
          • Thanks, risc - dave21, 17.06.2008, 23:22
          • Thanks, risc - goata007, 17.06.2008, 23:38
            • Thanks, risc - cal, 18.06.2008, 00:47
          • TAGOHL, where did you get the getifitinib? - benji, 18.06.2008, 03:52
            • Benji... - TAGOHL, 18.06.2008, 10:17
              • Benji... - bug2, 18.06.2008, 12:34
                • Benji... - TAGOHL, 18.06.2008, 13:42
                  • Benji... - benji, 18.06.2008, 16:19
                    • Sure, no problem. N/T - TAGOHL, 19.06.2008, 14:40
  • Another example - Follica may actually work! - biston, 17.06.2008, 05:41
    • someone can explains to me why this news argues in favour of follica? - biston, 17.06.2008, 07:03
  • This is quite significant guys. Here's the image. - debris, 17.06.2008, 16:54
    • Text of the article is here - debris, 17.06.2008, 16:55
      • Text of the article is here - Amilcar, 17.06.2008, 17:21
        • Text of the article is here - goata007, 17.06.2008, 17:25
          • Text of the article is here - Sceptic, 17.06.2008, 18:56
            • Text of the article is here - cal, 17.06.2008, 19:27
              • Text of the article is here - goata007, 17.06.2008, 20:02
              • Text of the article is here - benji, 18.06.2008, 03:59
                • Text of the article is here - cal, 18.06.2008, 05:06
                  • Text of the article is here - cal, 18.06.2008, 06:40
                  • Text of the article is here - TAGOHL, 18.06.2008, 11:27
                    • Text of the article is here - Baccy, 18.06.2008, 12:22
                      • Text of the article is here - TAGOHL, 18.06.2008, 13:33
                        • Text of the article is here - cal, 18.06.2008, 13:49
                          • Text of the article is here - TAGOHL, 18.06.2008, 14:17
                            • Text of the article is here - Baccy, 19.06.2008, 14:59
                    • Text of the article is here - haroldo, 19.06.2008, 06:30
                      • Text of the article is here - haroldo, 19.06.2008, 06:39
                  • Text of the article is here - benji, 19.06.2008, 08:16
                    • Text of the article is here - goata007, 19.06.2008, 11:20
                      • Text of the article is here - TAGOHL, 19.06.2008, 14:38
                • Text of the article is here - debris, 18.06.2008, 12:54
          • Text of the article is here - debris, 18.06.2008, 01:31
    • This is quite significant guys. Here's the image. - goata007, 18.06.2008, 09:25
      • This is quite significant guys. Here's the image. - Mr. Frodo, 18.06.2008, 12:55
        • This is quite significant guys. Here's the image. - rev, 19.06.2008, 22:11
          • This is quite significant guys. Here's the image. - cal, 20.06.2008, 02:51
      • This is quite significant guys. Here's the image. - debris, 18.06.2008, 12:57
      • This is quite significant guys. Here's the image. - goata007, 19.06.2008, 09:25
  • an interesting publication on gefitinib - risc, 18.06.2008, 07:15
    • To risc - Amilcar, 18.06.2008, 07:21
      • updated with new link - risc, 18.06.2008, 08:07
        • updated with new link - Amilcar, 18.06.2008, 08:18
    • To Risc - TAGOHL, 18.06.2008, 13:53
      • ...find just one article. - risc, 18.06.2008, 14:40
        • ...find just one article. - Baccy, 18.06.2008, 15:45
        • Thanks! N/T - TAGOHL, 18.06.2008, 16:51
          • Thanks! N/T - cal, 19.06.2008, 05:14
        • the second publication - risc, 19.06.2008, 05:52
          • Wow! - TAGOHL, 19.06.2008, 14:43
            • Wow! - benji, 19.06.2008, 16:23
          • the second publication - hairback, 19.06.2008, 14:56
            • the second publication - Sceptic, 19.06.2008, 15:38
              • We missed something about the Geftinib patient! - Amilcar, 25.06.2008, 09:33
                • goata007 this is for you - Amilcar, 25.06.2008, 19:15
                • We missed something about the Geftinib patient! - goata007, 25.06.2008, 19:52
                  • We missed something about the Geftinib patient! - cal, 25.06.2008, 19:55
                    • We missed something about the Geftinib patient! - Amilcar, 25.06.2008, 20:09
                      • We missed something about the Geftinib patient! - cal, 25.06.2008, 21:12