Hair Loss - Up close and personal - Testimony of CIT patient

hair loss products

Free Ads


shop
Forum News Hair Transplant Hair Replacement Topical All Natural Drugs Hair Multiplication Gallery Female Hair Loss

Hair Loss

Forum Index   Personal Journal   Poll

Log in | User | Register

Search:  
Back to forum
Board view

London Free Consultations Dec 15-19  |  Hair Transplant Patient Reviews
 

Up close and personal - Testimony of CIT patient (Hair Transplant)

posted by bigmac, 26.06.2008, 03:06

CIT/DR Cole,

Your last post which was very predictable speaks volumes to the readers, potential transplant recipients, your peers, patients and myself of course. You did not answer a single question. In the end, instead you attempted (without success might I add) tactics of deflections, links to your website, diversions, twists of words, hiding behind a "secret trade formula" and now undertones of irritability.

If you want to know the truth of what I know it is this.

1. ALL FUE CLINICS use a circular punch. These punches are of an (x) diameter. I have read for 2 years now that there are a plethora of physicians using the 0.75mm -1.0mm punch with success. You stated emphatically on your in-house biased punch study and here on hairsite that the smallest punch which is a standard for micro-punch technology, 0.75mm punch, was a marketing tactic. Then you go on to say that you first introduced the 0.75mm and that it did not work in your hands. When I asked you for clarifications of the any punch statistics and especially of your large 1.1, 1.2, 1.3mm punches, you told me not to worry about such things. (Red flag IMO).

Why does the semantics of punch sizes bother many people including myself. Well there was a time when plug transplants were introduced to the public. The lay public did not have the resources to ask for proof that it worked (The internet). No one had a place to discuss the standard plug extraction punch of 1.4mm. It took 10 to 15 years for the public to realize that that size punch can leave a pluggy mess. (You certainly brag about repairing these patients.) In my opinion your 1.1mm - 1.3mm punch is too close to the old days of plug punch diameters. So my concern was knowing that.
A. You speak about the 0.75mm punch like it is useless; that everyone that uses it is a marketeer.
B Deny that its use has been successful in so many physicians skilled hands, i.e. Dr. Bisanga, HDC, GHI, Dr. Poswal, Dr. Iltler, and others.
C. Deny to the public any confirmation of statistics about any punch you have used. Yet the only diameter you mention is a 0.75mm punch.
D. Last week you had 1 million extractions, this week 2 million extractions.
E. No one physician will speak about your claims here or anywhere.
F. Research that has not been repeated outside of your clinic, for instance the "less is more" theory.

2. My questions are too difficult for you to answer. But in my opinion The days of "letting" the doctor do as he wishes without questioning are gone. There are too many clinics that show there best results and nothing else. There are too many clinics that have unanswered questions. In your case I do not understand why there are so many many unclear inconsistencies and conflicts.

Then I arrive at an epiphany when reading your last post. And I quote:

"... our patients have no clue of what tools or what tool size we use. We are a few steps ahead of the patients.

That really says it all.


Thanks

Bigmac.


bigmac is located in [NA] and he is available to meet: NO

Thread locked
 

Complete thread:

Back to forum
Board view
41710 Postings in 3843 Threads, 1685 registered users
Hair Loss | Admin contact
powered by MLF | FORUM POLICY

Dr. Klein: most comprehensive topical hair loss therapy
click here