Hair Loss - More CIT

hair loss products

Free Ads


shop
Forum News Hair Transplant Hair Replacement Topical All Natural Drugs Hair Multiplication Gallery Female Hair Loss

Hair Loss

Forum Index   Personal Journal   Poll

Log in | User | Register

Search:  
Back to forum
Board view

London Free Consultations Dec 15-19  |  Hair Transplant Patient Reviews
 

More CIT (Hair Transplant)

posted by CIT E-mail, 26.06.2008, 10:12
(edited by CIT on 26.06.2008, 10:18)

» CIT/DR Cole,
»
» Your last post which was very predictable speaks volumes to the readers,
» potential transplant recipients, your peers, patients and myself of course.
» You did not answer a single question. In the end, instead you attempted
» (without success might I add) tactics of deflections, links to your
» website, diversions, twists of words, hiding behind a "secret trade
» formula" and now undertones of irritability.
»
» If you want to know the truth of what I know it is this.
»
» 1. ALL FUE CLINICS use a circular punch. These punches are of an (x)
» diameter. I have read for 2 years now that there are a plethora of
» physicians using the 0.75mm -1.0mm punch with success. You stated
» emphatically on your in-house biased punch study and here on hairsite that
» the smallest punch which is a standard for micro-punch technology, 0.75mm
» punch, was a marketing tactic. Then you go on to say that you first
» introduced the 0.75mm and that it did not work in your hands. When I asked
» you for clarifications of the any punch statistics and especially of your
» large 1.1, 1.2, 1.3mm punches, you told me not to worry about such things.
» (Red flag IMO).
»
» Why does the semantics of punch sizes bother many people including myself.
» Well there was a time when plug transplants were introduced to the public.
» The lay public did not have the resources to ask for proof that it worked
» (The internet). No one had a place to discuss the standard plug extraction
» punch of 1.4mm. It took 10 to 15 years for the public to realize that that
» size punch can leave a pluggy mess. (You certainly brag about repairing
» these patients.) In my opinion your 1.1mm - 1.3mm punch is too close to the
» old days of plug punch diameters. So my concern was knowing that.
» A. You speak about the 0.75mm punch like it is useless; that everyone that
» uses it is a marketeer.
» B Deny that its use has been successful in so many physicians skilled
» hands, i.e. Dr. Bisanga, HDC, GHI, Dr. Poswal, Dr. Iltler, and others.
» C. Deny to the public any confirmation of statistics about any punch you
» have used. Yet the only diameter you mention is a 0.75mm punch.
» D. Last week you had 1 million extractions, this week 2 million
» extractions.
» E. No one physician will speak about your claims here or anywhere.
» F. Research that has not been repeated outside of your clinic, for
» instance the "less is more" theory.
»
» 2. My questions are too difficult for you to answer. But in my opinion The
» days of "letting" the doctor do as he wishes without questioning are gone.
» There are too many clinics that show there best results and nothing else.
» There are too many clinics that have unanswered questions. In your case I
» do not understand why there are so many many unclear inconsistencies and
» conflicts.
»
» Then I arrive at an epiphany when reading your last post. And I quote:
»
» "... our patients have no clue of what tools or what tool size we use. We
» are a few steps ahead of the patients.
»
» That really says it all.
»
»
» Thanks
»
» Bigmac.
Top of the morning Bigmac,

No, most instruments can be applicable in specific instances. For the fourth and last time, I simply said that Dr. Cole first introduced the small instrument to the hair transplant community. Yes, our number of extractions is well over 1 million and very near to 2,000,000 so I wouldn’t be too concerned about our hair transplant experience. I purposely started the thread to give each individual or physician the opportunity to make his or her claim. As you can see, we have no takers as of yet. Hmmm…..

I even gave you the time to provide evidence of CIT unsatisfied patients but you declined or wasn’t successful. The remainder of your conversation regarding the “less if more” really doesn’t equate to a debate.

Bigmac, your questions are oh so very simple and direct. What more can an ethical clinic show other than the befores and after results while including the results on the donor area(s)? Once again which clinic will rival our results and include donor area results at 1 year post-op?

I am glad that you finally understand nothing about our procedure.

Yours truly,

CIT
[image]
[image]


CIT is located in [NA] and he is available to meet: NO

---
Toll Free: 800 368 4247
USA: 1 (678) 566-1011
Email: consults@forhair.com

www.forhair.com

Thread locked
 

Complete thread:

Back to forum
Board view
41709 Postings in 3843 Threads, 1685 registered users
Hair Loss | Admin contact
powered by MLF | FORUM POLICY

Dr. Klein: most comprehensive topical hair loss therapy
click here