Hair Loss - Plucked hairs with Acell.

Hair Loss

Forum Index   Personal Journal   Poll   Hair Transplant Reviews

Log in | User | Register

Search:  
Back to forum
Board view

featured hair transplant results & topics
 free hair transplant consultations in London, Los Angeles, New York, and cities worldwide

-HDC 2590 grafts FUE - scalp chest beard.
-Hasson & Wong: 5820 grafts strip, 1 session, 5 yr update.
-Dr. Arvind , an educational case, 6031 grafts FUE.
-Dr. Woods: another success story with low graft count.
-Alvi Armani 4977 grafts FUE to create a near flawless hairline.

-Dr. Baubac (Alvi Armani) 2666 grafts FUE, 11 months.
-Hasson & Wong 5400 grafts for a Norwood 5A
-Dr. Umar 10500 grafts Beard and Head FUE on pure NW7.
-Dr. Bisanga 2663 grafts FUE, NW3, 12 months.
-Dr. Ray Woods: BEST 600 grafts ever!!
 

Plucked hairs with Acell. (Hair Regrowth Research & Clinical Trials)

posted by Iron_Man, 02.02.2011, 13:40

» Only a lawyer can say.

So let’s ask the experts:

img/uploaded_files/2879_file28.pdf

File Source

Quote what you don’t understand!

According to experts, the same as I already mentioned:

It doesn’t matter in which way the inventor removes hairs, as long as the BASIC effect/MAIN goal/effect 2 or more hairs from 1), respectively HOW and in which way (just with fingers or tweezers or needles or with his ass) the inventor is able to isolate the necessary hairs + cells to create the MAIN goal/effect (that’s the MAIN reason why it is patentable at all).
Also, according to the experts, it doesn’t matter which product of any manufacturer/company (Merck, Sigma, ACell etc) the inventor chooses, who manufactures an extracellular matrix (ECM), as long as IT IS an extracellular matrix product OR any substitute therefor (e.g. if the inventor can’t get a suitable ECM or even found something more suitable as substitute etc) what helps to create the desired effect (tissue engineering for hair duplication/multiplication). In simple words, EVERYTHING what works best. Also according to the experts, the BASIC idea simply IS patented, even all the made claims in the patent are very brief (simple written) and without each and every detail of the invention.

So simply compare the made claims by experts (pdf/link) with the discussed patent claims:

http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wo.jsp?IA=NL2006000588&DISPLAY=CLAIMS

@AntiNorwood – You’re right concerning "patent system in general and the needed protection of someones intellectural property“.




Iron_Man is located in [NA] and he is available to meet: NO

---
I documented the world’s 1st day-by-day (HST) donor hair regeneration process …

Post reply
  Review Post

Complete thread:

Back to forum
Board view
109172 Postings in 10149 Threads, 4746 registered users
Hair Loss | Admin contact
| TERMS OF USE

 
origenere hair loss treatment

Disclosure: This is an advertising site for our paid sponsors & advertisers. The contents, videos & photos on HairSite are provided by paid sponsors and are not endorsed by HairSite in any way. The recommendations, results, and representations made by our sponsors/advertisers do not reflect the opinions of HairSite. This site is to showcase successful hair restoration results only. It is not the mandate of this site to engage in the discussion of failed, unsuccessful procedures, lawsuits, litigations or complaint cases; comments of such nature, including external links, may be removed from the forum. Notify hairsite@aol.com any false, defamatory, misleading or inappropriate user generated contents for immediate removal from the forum. Also read Terms of Use & Privacy Statement |  HairSite advertisers: Dr. Baubac (Alvi Armani) | Dr. Bhatti | Dr. Bisanga | Dr. Cole | Dr.Epstein | Dr. Jones | Hasson & Wong | Dr. Klein | Dr. Madhu | Dr. Ng | Dr. Poswal | Dr. Rahal | Dr. Razack | Dr. Reddy | Dr. Umar | Dr. Woods | DHI Global | HDC Clinic | HairDirect |Lasercomb | Ziering Medical | Wilshire Wigs |