Hair Loss - but a response from bilo

classified ads


shop
Forum News Hair Transplant Hair Replacement Topical All Natural Drugs Hair Multiplication Gallery Female Hair Loss

Hair Loss

Forum Index   Personal Journal   Poll

Log in | User | Register

Search:  
Back to forum
Board view

FREE Hair Transplant Consultations with HDC: London - Sep 1-5
 click here
 

but a response from bilo (Hair Transplant)

posted by Bilo, 30.07.2007, 16:35

» » » Email joe@hassonandwong.com
» »
» » I did, no response. I don't see why he can't just respond here. What
» is
» » the big deal?
»
» I don't know. You tell me. What's the big deal? Joe heard from someone
» who said HM may be 10 years away. It's second hand information, it's not
» from someone within Intercytex. It's not verifiable. It cannot be
» substantiated. So what's the big deal? Why obsessed over it? It's
» speculation at best.
»
» Jotronic doesn't want to divulge any more details given how fanatic people
» can get in the forum. His words were literally twisted to read "someone
» deep in the know at Intercytex" which is NOT what he said.
Mind if I answer this question, Hairsite? I'll tell you what the big deal is. The big deal isn't what Jotronic had said. What he actually had said, I quoted word for word in the HM forum, including a back link here. We then proceeded to have a lively discussion in the HM forum, which, like about every discussion on that forum, included second-hand, unverifiable, unsubstantiated information. And all was well. In fact, even your friend Jotronic, with all his bizarre immunity from critical analysis that he seems to have on this board, contributed to the thread and, in his own words "learned something".

We know the flaws in the information Hairsite; THAT is not the big deal. Nor are we obsessing about the information itself. Asking for further information about a potentially significant statement made by a 'respected' member of the board about HM is hardly obsessing. If you hadn't taken it upon yourself to delete a perfectly good and informative thread, no sorry, two of them, there would be no big deal.

All we want is for the information that Jotronic gave to be available out there for us to know, debate, and DECIDE FOR OURSELVES whether or not it is valid. We resent the fact that you treat us like little kids, trying to tell us which information is worth knowing and which isn't, and further, we resent it even more considering how much speculative garbage DOES make it onto the HM forum. It further worries us when we wonder what other potentially information you've deleted, before we've managed to see it. Well, Hairsite, we will not let that happen to this particular nugget of information. YOU have made it a big deal.

---
In late July, Jotronic posted in response to a question on HM on a transplant thread in the other forum, that he talked to somebody he knew "deep in the know" with regards to Intercytex's procedure, who felt that it would be at least ten years before Intercytex had a marketable product. The thread was deleted by Hairsite, in an unfathomable attempt to hush this up.

Thread locked
 

Complete thread:

Back to forum
Board view
35824 Postings in 3312 Threads, 1545 registered users
Hair Loss | Admin contact
powered by MLF | FORUM POLICY

Dr. Klein's REMOX Topical Hair Loss Therapy
 click here