Re: Dear Dr. Gho

From: Bill
Date: 7/24/00
Time: 6:30:01 PM
Remote Name: 207.90.152.245

Comments

Hi TK, I do not apologize for my remarks. I do not hold Gho in the god-status that all the rest of you do. It is just as likely that he is holding things up, as it is that he is out there working on technicalities. I have believed, and always have, that this process could have been done years ago, and that if we, as a large group of people express an interest, then if not Gho, then one of a hundred other researchers. The only reason we are having this discussion at all is because you think Gho can give you something, and you are worrying about biting the hand that may be able to feed you. I mean come on, some one does not respond for 2 years, and then all of a sudden responds at a time when there may be some opposition to him being King. I felt about as polite as I could possibly be. As far as the web site goes, I do wish you would respond to me in that regards. I have politely asked you several things. In terms of Gho, he is gonna get mentioned, if I have my way, as 1 line about research being done in the Netherlands. I am not slamming any individual in the web. In fact, quite the contrary. I have done the initial writings for most of the topics. I did not even mention his name or any other researcher. It is about educating the people about HM. As far as I am concerned, the current researchers are just a point of interest - nothing more. One of the main goals is to get much research started. If one of the current researchers comes out with something, fine. A new researcher will come out with an improvement. But I would like to take the time to openly thank you for giving of your time for the research you have done, and hope that we can have a working, communicating relationship between the two of us. Most of the front page is done, but I still need someone to lead the psychological portion. I see it as a mini-page of its own, with several buttons. I think you would be a wonderful choice for that.