|
Intercytex
TrichoCyte (ICX-TRC):
Cell Based Hair Regeneration Therapy
Interview with
Dr. Paul Kemp
Founder & Chief Scientific
Officer |
 |

September, 2006
Intercytex (ICX.L) is an emerging healthcare company known for its ability
to use proprietary technologies to isolate, culture, and deliver human
cells for the treatment of wounds and other aesthetic conditions.
Ever since the
announcement of
a research product called TrichoCyte (ICX-TRC), Intercytex has become the single most
frequently discussed topic in HairSite. ICX-TRC is an autologous cell
based therapy for hair regeneration. With this technique, the
hair-inductive dermal papilla cells are dissected from hair follicle
samples taken from the patient. The cells are then cultured and multiplied
in a proprietary process and subsequently injected into the patient’s
scalp using a specialized deliver system.
Phase I of the clinical trial was completed in 2005. The following article
is based on HairSite’s interview with Dr. Paul Kemp, founder
and Chief Scientific Officer of Intercytex. This interviewed was
conducted in September 2006 when phase II of the ICX-TRC trial has
officially begun. Dr. Kemp hopes that this interview will help HairSite
members better understand the current status of their research and clear
some of the confusions surrounding this breakthrough in hair restoration
procedure.
Information presented herein is a truthful account of the conversations
between David Tse (HairSite’s founder) and Dr. Paul Kemp. HairSite will
take full responsibility for any inaccuracies or misrepresentations
contained in this article.

graphical
illustration provided by courtesy of Intercytex
www.intercytex.com
Phase I - Background
Phase I of the ICX-TRC trial was designed to evaluate what concentration
of cultured suspension to use in the volunteers, how deep to administer
the injections, and safety issues associated with the protocol. One of the
main goals for phase I was to ensure that the procedure does not result
in complications of any sort among the test subjects. Phase I was
concluded in 2005. A lot was learnt from the trial regarding the delivery
and dosing requirements of this product. No known side effects,
complications or adverse response were discovered among the test
subjects. The trial was conducted under the guidance of Dr Bessam Farjo
of the Farjo Clinic. Dr Farjo said, “I am delighted that TrichoCyte has
proven safe in all volunteers enrolled into the trial, as this approach to
new hair induction will represent a step-change in the way male pattern
baldness is treated in the future.”
Phase I – Test Site
A
total of 7 volunteers were enrolled for phase I. The area that was tested
was 1 sq cm in size. Each volunteer received 100 injections of the
cultured cells in the 1 sq cm recipient site. The time required to
administer 1 injection was approximately 5 seconds. Each injection
delivered about 1 micro liter of cultured cells.
Phase I – Results
Among
the 7 subjects that were enrolled for phase I, 5 reported an increase in
hair numbers. Dr. Kemp, being one of the test subjects himself, reported
an improvement of about 66 new hairs as a result of the 100 injections.
Varying degree of hair regeneration was observed among the 5 participants
who showed an improvement. Dr. Kemp's results were considered average
among the 5 participants. There were volunteers who actually reported
greater increase in hair numbers than Dr. Kemp. It is unknown why 2 of
the 7 participants did not show any improvement. One possible explanation
is the timing of hair cycling.
When
asked about the characteristics of the new hairs observed in the test
subjects and whether they resembled cosmetically acceptable terminal
hairs, Dr. Kemp said it is premature to conclude at this point given that
the test area was only 1 sq cm in size. Also, the fact that the test site
was shaved in order to facilitate the hair count made it difficult to
evaluate the aesthetics quality of the ICX-TRC induced hairs. It is hoped
that the final product will deliver cosmetically acceptable results with
near “terminal hair” quality. More conclusive observations and evidence
about the hair characteristics will be available upon the completion of
phase 2.
Phase II - the Design
Phase
II has officially started in September 2006. Up to 20 test subjects may be
enrolled for phase II. Only local subjects will be recruited. Not all test
subjects are scheduled to begin the trial at the same time. There will be
fine-tuning and adjustments to the protocol as the trial progresses. Dr.
Kemp described phase II as a "rolling or staggering" trial in the sense
that the protocol may evolve over the duration of the trial. More than 1
protocol may be tested in phase II depending on the initial results.
In
phase II, there will be TWO test sites on each volunteer’s
scalp. The first test site is on a completely bald area measuring about 1
sq cm. This site will be subject to100 injections of the cultured
suspension. Unlike the first test site that resides on a completely bald
area, the second test site is on a much larger area containing thinning
hair. The second site will be subject to 900 injections. In other words,
each volunteer will receive 1,000 injections divided between two test
sites on his scalp. Both test sites will be administered and monitored
simultaneously.
Evaluation of the 900-injections test site will be done primarily through
photographic assessment of the before and after changes. A more detailed
graft-by-graft hair count assessment will be performed on the smaller
100-injections test site.
If all
goes as expected, phase II may be concluded in approximately 1 year.
Phase
III & Beyond
Nothing conclusive can be determined at this point as to how phase III
will be implemented. A lot will be dictated by the results and findings
from phase II. Dr. Kemp envisions that phase III will very likely be a
multi-centers (U.K & U.S) trial involving more test subjects. Phase III
will be similar to the commercial application of the final product that
will be made available to the general public. If all goes as expected,
phase III may last for approximately 1 year. After the completion of
Phase III, Intercytex will proceed to apply for MHRA approval. MHRA is
the U.K equivalent of the FDA in the U.S. There might be plans to submit
applications to both MHRA and FDA simultaneously upon successful
completion of phase III. It is not known how long it will take to obtain
MHRA approval, although a 12-18 months timeframe is expected.
Traditional Hair Transplant Techniques,
Minoxidil & Propecia
Dr.
Kemp does not anticipate that ICX-TRC will completely obsolete traditional
hair transplant procedures the moment it becomes available to the public.
There will be first generation ICX-TRC, second generation ICX-TRC, and
third generation ICX-TRC etc. over time. Hair transplant will still have a
role to play in the beginning especially for the hairline design. However,
the demand for traditional hair transplant procedures may diminish as each
succeeding ICX-TRC protocol becomes more refined and perfect than its
predecessors. Also, younger patients who just started losing their hair
may turn to ICX-TRC before they consider more invasive options such as
hair transplant. If ICX-TRC is administered to a patient early enough upon
initial signs of hair loss, this may eliminate the need for traditional
hair transplant procedures entirely later on in his life.
While
it is believed that the role of traditional hair transplant may diminish
over time, products such as minoxidil and Propecia will still have an
important role to play when ICX-TRC becomes available to the general
public. These products will be an important adjunct that complement
ICX-TRC induced hair growth.
Intercytex & Bosley Distribution Agreement
With
respect to the distribution agreement between Intercytex and Bosley that
was previously reported on HairSite back in 2004, Dr. Kemp clarified that
it is an “option” that Bosley can exercise upon completion of the phase II
trial. There is no formal agreement in place at this point that will make
Bosley the exclusive distributor of ICX-TRC. But Bosley will be given the
first rights to negotiate.
Cost & The Proprietary
Culturing Process
It is unclear how the cost will
eventually be determined. “It is premature at this point to discuss cost”,
said Dr. Kemp. The ultimate cost of the procedure will very likely be a
collaborative decision between Intercytex and the clinic that will be
administering the injections. While it only takes seconds to administer 1
injection, the cells dissection and culturing process are critical steps
that are extremely onerous. According to Dr Kemp, it is a very
labor-intensive process dissecting the dermal papilla cells and culturing
them. Typically it can take up to 2 months from the time a biopsy is taken
before the cultured cells are ready for injection. It is hoped that over
time there will be ways to streamline the dissection and culturing process
to keep the cost down for the general public
Rejuvenation vs Neogenesis
When
asked about the age-old question of whether this type of cell therapy
rejuvenates existing follicles or creates new ones, Dr. Kemp said it is
not really their goal to understand how the new hairs are formed. It could
very well be a combination of both. More in-depth studies and research are
necessary before an intelligent answer can be deliberated. At this point,
Intercytex’s main focus is to ensure that the protocol is capable of
delivering a cosmetically acceptable difference in the test subjects.
Closing Comments
Dr.
Kemp is aware of the keen interest among HairSite members on the subject
of cell based hair regeneration therapy. This interview is intended to
provide our readers a more factual aspect of the recent developments in
Intercytex’s research. The timelines given in this interview are estimates
at best. Readers are cautioned that there are uncertainties in all aspect
of scientific research. This article contains forward-looking statement
and information. Nothing contained in this interview shall be construed as
the definitive guide with respect to the future development of TrichoCyte (ICX-TRC).
|
About Intercytex:
Intercytex commenced operations in 2000 and currently
employs around 70 staff. In addition to its head office in
Cambridge, UK, it has a GMP clinical production facility
plus research and development laboratories in Manchester,
UK. Additional laboratories are located in Boston, USA. Intercytex’
shares were admitted for trading on the Alternative Investment
Market of the London Stock Exchange on 1 February 2006 under the
ticker symbol ICX.L. |
*All images used on this page are
provided by courtesy of Intercytex,
www.intercytex.com