Hair Loss Forum

idiotic assumptions (Hair Transplant)

posted by marco, U.K, 12.05.2011, 11:02

»
» That is fine if you prefer to see the full before and after results even
» for areas that did not receive any treatment. However, why did you only
» subject Dr. Armani's results to such scrutiny?
»
» The vast majority of the doctors here only show before and after results of
» the areas that were treated. How come you have no problem with their
» posts?

I think that you are right in that there is more suspicion of Armani than other surgeons. The results that he shows are usually very impressive and buck the trend of what can usually be expected from others. He told me that I had 20K available donor hair by FUE since I had 40K donor availability. This may very well be true but it is several times more than others would offer.

The particular issue with this post is that he shows the full extent of baldness in the before and a birds eye view but does not do this in the after. I think that is a little deceptive although I am sure it is not intentional.

I recall a post by robert Jones on this site where he showed a 2K result that gave the impression of complete class V coverage but when a birds eye view came out a year later the coverage and density were actually minimal.

Buyer beware may often be the mantra but it is natural that posters want the full picture. Personally I believe it is best to pick on everyone but preferably in a polite way ...... unless it is ray woods of cause as he more than gives as good as he gets and is quite funny with it ... if not a little nutty with it.



marco has 3 Personal Journal(s). Click here to view
marco is located in U.K and he is available to meet: NO

Complete thread:

• Alvi Armani - 3,500 grafts FUE - Pats205, 30.04.2011, 15:41 (Hair Transplant)
  • Alvi Armani - 3,500 grafts FUE - fastforward, 02.05.2011, 00:09
    • Alvi Armani - 3,500 grafts FUE - Freddie555, 02.05.2011, 08:36
      • Alvi Armani - 3,500 grafts FUE - Reddog, 03.05.2011, 04:38
        • idiotic assumptions - quarterhead, 03.05.2011, 23:08
          • idiotic assumptions - Stevie.Dee, 03.05.2011, 23:16
            • idiotic assumptions - HairSite, 04.05.2011, 05:42
              • idiotic assumptions - Freddie555, 04.05.2011, 06:07
                • idiotic assumptions - Xairyhay1, 06.05.2011, 04:47
                  • idiotic assumptions - Eurohair1621, 06.05.2011, 05:11
                • idiotic assumptions - HairSite, 11.05.2011, 20:46
                  • idiotic assumptions - marco, 12.05.2011, 11:02
                    • idiotic assumptions - Dr. Woods, 16.05.2011, 21:44
                      • idiotic assumptions - marco, 16.05.2011, 22:34
                        • idiotic assumptions - Duck, 16.05.2011, 22:39
                          • idiotic assumptions - marco, 17.05.2011, 11:13
                      • idiotic assumptions - craig, 21.05.2011, 19:01
              • I'll tell you why - quarterhead, 06.05.2011, 05:57
                • Objective - ak, 29.05.2011, 00:19
                  • Objective - Pats205, 29.05.2011, 01:03